Determinants of Procedural Pain Intensity in the Intensive Care Unit The Europain (R) Study


Por: Puntillo, KA, Max, A, Timsit, JF, Vignoud, L, Chanques, G, Robleda, G, Roche-Campo, F, Mancebo, J, Divatia, JV, Soares, M, Ionescu, DC, Grintescu, I, Vasiliu, IL, Maggiore, SM, Rusinova, K, Owczuk, R, Egerod, I, Papathanassoglou, EDE, Kyranou, M, Joynt, GM, Burghi, G, Freebairn, RC, Ho, KM, Kaarlola, A, Gerritsen, RT, Kesecioglu, J, Sulaj, MMS, Norrenberg, M, Benoit, DD, Seha, MSG, Hennein, A, Periera, FJ, Benbenishty, JS, Abroug, F, Aquilina, A, Monte, JRC, An, YZ, Azoulay, E

Publicada: 1 ene 2014
Resumen:
Rationale: Intensive careunit (ICU) patients undergo several diagnostic and therapeutic procedures every day. The prevalence, intensity, and risk factors of pain related to these procedures are not well known. Objectives: To assess self-reported procedural pain intensity versus baseline pain, examine pain intensity differences across procedures, and identify risk factors for procedural pain intensity. Methods: Prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter, multinational study of pain intensity associated with 12 procedures. Data were obtained from 3,851 patients who underwent 4,812 procedures in 192 ICUs in 28 countries. Measurements and Main Results: Pain intensity on a 0-10 numeric rating scale increased significantly from baseline pain during all procedures (P < 0.001). Chest tube removal, wound drain removal, and arterial line insertion were the three most painful procedures, with median pain scores of 5 (3-7), 4.5 (2-7), and 4 (2-6), respectively. By multivariate analysis, risk factors independently associated with greater procedural pain intensity were the specific procedure; opioid administration specifically for the procedure; preprocedural pain intensity; preprocedural pain distress; intensity of the worst pain on the same day, before the procedure; and procedure not performed by a nurse. A significant ICU effect was observed, with no visible effect of country because of its absorption by the ICU effect. Some of the risk factors became nonsignificant when each procedure was examined separately. Conclusions: Knowledge of risk factors for greater procedural pain intensity identified in this study may help clinicians select interventions that are needed to minimize procedural pain.

Filiaciones:
Puntillo, KA:
 Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Physiol Nursing, 2 Koret Way,Box 0610, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA

Max, A:
 Univ Paris Diderot, St Louis Hosp, Med Intens Care Unit, Paris, France

Timsit, JF:
 Hop A Michallon, Med Intens Care Unit, Grenoble, France

Vignoud, L:
 INSERM, U823, Inst Albert Bonniot, Grenoble, France

Chanques, G:
 Hop St Eloi, Dept Anesthesie Reanimat, Montpellier, France

 Univ Montpellier, Inst Natl Sante & Rech, Unite U1046, F-34059 Montpellier, France

Robleda, G:
 Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Serv Med Intens, Barcelona, Spain

Roche-Campo, F:
 Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Serv Med Intens, Barcelona, Spain

Mancebo, J:
 Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Serv Med Intens, Barcelona, Spain

Divatia, JV:
 Tata Mem Hosp, Bombay 400012, Maharashtra, India

Soares, M:
 Inst Nacl Canc, DOr Inst Res Educ, Postgrad Program, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil

Ionescu, DC:
 Iuliu Hatieganu Univ Med & Pharm, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care 1, Cluj Napoca, Romania

Grintescu, I:
 Clin Emergency Hosp, Anesthesia & Intens Care Dept, Bucharest, Romania

Vasiliu, IL:
 Clin Emergency Hosp, Anesthesia & Intens Care Dept, Bucharest, Romania

Maggiore, SM:
 Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Policlin A Gemelli, Rome, Italy

Rusinova, K:
 Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Gen Univ Hosp, Prague, Czech Republic

Owczuk, R:
 Med Univ Gdansk, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Therapy, Gdansk, Poland

Egerod, I:
 Rigshosp, Ctr Trauma, Copenhagen Univ Hosp, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Papathanassoglou, EDE:
 Cyprus Univ Technol, Dept Nursing, Nicosia, Cyprus

Kyranou, M:
 Papageorgiou Hosp, Dept Nursing, Thessaloniki, Greece

Joynt, GM:
 Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Prince Wales Hosp, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China

Burghi, G:
 Santorio Amer & Sanatorio Hosp Montevideo, Intens Care Unit, Hosp Maciel, Montevideo, Uruguay

Freebairn, RC:
 Hawkes Bay Hosp, Intens Care Serv, Hastings, New Zealand

Ho, KM:
 Royal Perth Hosp, Dept Intens Care Med, Perth, WA 6001, Australia

 Royal Perth Hosp, Sch Populat Hlth, Perth, WA 6001, Australia

 Univ Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia

Kaarlola, A:
 Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Surg, Helsinki, Finland

Gerritsen, RT:
 Med Ctr Leeuwarden, Dept Intens Care, Leeuwarden, Netherlands

Kesecioglu, J:
 Univ Med Ctr, Dept Intens Care Med, Utrecht, Netherlands

Sulaj, MMS:
 Comenius Univ, Clin Anesthesiol & Intens Med, Jessenius Fac Med Martin, Univ Hosp Martinique, Martin, Slovakia

Norrenberg, M:
 Erasme Univ Hosp, Intens Care Unit Dept, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Benoit, DD:
 Univ Libre Bruxelles, Dept Intens Care, Erasme Univ Hosp, Brussels, Belgium

Seha, MSG:
 Spital Maennedorf, ICU Maennedorf, Mannedorf, Switzerland

Hennein, A:
 Khoula Hosp, ICU Dept, Muscat, Oman

Periera, FJ:
 Clin Las Amer, Intens Care Unit, Medellin, Columbia, Colombia

Benbenishty, JS:
 Hadassah Hebrew Univ Hosp, ICU, Med ICU, Jerusalem, Israel

Abroug, F:
 CHU F Bourguiba, Intens Care Unit, Monastir, Tunisia

Aquilina, A:
 Mater Dei Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Msida, Malta

Monte, JRC:
 Ctr Hosp Porto, Serv Cuidados Intens, Hosp Santo Antonio, Oporto, Portugal

An, YZ:
 Peking Univ, Peoples Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China

Azoulay, E:
 Univ Paris Diderot, St Louis Hosp, Med Intens Care Unit, Paris, France
ISSN: 1073449X





AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Editorial
AMER THORACIC SOC, 25 BROADWAY, 18 FL, NEW YORK, NY 10004 USA, Estados Unidos America
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 189 Número: 1
Páginas: 39-47
WOS Id: 000329784800012
ID de PubMed: 24262016

MÉTRICAS