Salvage brachytherapy in prostate local recurrence after radiation therapy: predicting factors for control and toxicity


Por: Henriquez, I, Sancho, G, Hervas, A, Guix, B, Pera, J, Gutierrez, C, Abuchaibe, O, Martinez-Monge, R, Tormo, A, Polo, A

Publicada: 30 abr 2014
Resumen:
Purpose: To evaluate efficacy and toxicity after salvage brachytherapy (BT) in prostate local recurrence after radiation therapy. Methods and materials: Between 1993 and 2007, we retrospectively analyzed 56 consecutively patients (pts) undergoing salvage brachytherapy. After local biopsy-proven recurrence, pts received 145 Gy LDR-BT (37 pts, 66%) or HDR-BT (19 pts, 34%) in different dose levels according to biological equivalent doses (BED2 Gy). By the time of salvage BT, only 15 pts (27%) received ADT. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of biochemical control and toxicities. Acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCv3.0). Results: Median follow-up after salvage BT was 48 months. The 5-year FFbF was 77%. HDR and LDR late grade 3 GU toxicities were observed in 21% and 24%. Late grade 3 GI toxicities were observed in 2% (HDR) and 2.7% (LDR). On univariate analysis, pre-salvage prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 10 ng/ml (p = 0.004), interval to relapse after initial treatment < 24 months (p = 0.004) and salvage HDR-BT doses BED2 (Gy) level < 227 Gy (p = 0.012) were significant in predicting biochemical failure. On Cox multivariate analysis, pre-salvage PSA, and time to relapse were significant in predicting biochemical failure. HDR-BT BED2 Gy (alpha/beta 1.5 Gy) levels >= 227 (p = 0.013), and ADT (p = 0.049) were significant in predicting grade >= 2 urinary toxicity. Conclusions: Prostate BT is an effective salvage modality in some selected prostate local recurrence patients after radiation therapy. Even, we provide some potential predictors of biochemical control and toxicity for prostate salvage BT, further investigation is recommended.

Filiaciones:
Henriquez, I:
 Univ Hosp St Joan, Inst Invest Sanitaria Pere Virgili, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tarragona, Spain

 IMOR, Radiat Oncol Med Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Barcelona, Spain

Sancho, G:
 Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Dept Radiat Oncol, Barcelona, Spain

Hervas, A:
 Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Dept Radiat Oncol, Brachytherapy Unit, E-28034 Madrid, Spain

Guix, B:
 IMOR, Radiat Oncol Med Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Barcelona, Spain

Pera, J:
 Inst Catala Oncol, Dept Radiat Oncol, Brachytherapy Unit, Barcelona, Spain

Gutierrez, C:
 Inst Catala Oncol, Dept Radiat Oncol, Brachytherapy Unit, Barcelona, Spain

Abuchaibe, O:
 Virgilio Galvis Ramirez Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Bucaramanga, Colombia

Martinez-Monge, R:
 Univ Navarra Clin, CUN, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pamplona, Spain

Tormo, A:
 Univ Hosp Politecn La Fe, Dept Radiat Oncol, Valencia, Spain

Polo, A:
 Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Dept Radiat Oncol, Brachytherapy Unit, E-28034 Madrid, Spain
ISSN: 1748717X





Radiation Oncology
Editorial
BMC, CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND, Reino Unido
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 9 Número:
Páginas:
WOS Id: 000335795900001
ID de PubMed: 24885287
imagen Gold, Green Published

MÉTRICAS