A Reporting Tool for Adapted Guidelines in Health Care: The RIGHT-Ad@pt Checklist
Por:
Song, Y, Alonso-Coello, P, Ballesteros, M, Cluzeau, F, Vernooij, RWM, Arayssi, T, Bhaumik, S, Chen, YL, Ghersi, D, Langlois, EV, Padilla, PF, Schunemann, HJ, Akl, EA, Garcia, LM, RIGHT-Adpt Working Grp
Publicada:
1 may 2022
Ahead of Print:
1 mar 2022
Resumen:
Background: Adaptation of existing guidelines can be an efficient way to develop contextualized recommendations. Transparent reporting of the adaptation approach can support the transparency and usability of the adapted guidelines. Objective: To develop an extension of the RIGHT (Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare) statement for the reporting of adapted guidelines (including recommendations that have been adopted, adapted, or developed de novo), the RIGHT-Ad@pt checklist. Design: A multistep process was followed to develop the check-list: establishing a working group, generating an initial checklist, optimizing the checklist (through an initial assessment of adapted guidelines, semistructured interviews, a Delphi consensus survey, an external review, and a final assessment of adapted guidelines), and approval of the final checklist by the working group. Setting: International collaboration. Participants: A total of 119 professionals participated in the development process. Measurements: Participants' consensus on items in the checklist. Results: The RIGHT-Ad@pt checklist contains 34 items grouped in 7 sections: basic information (7 items); scope (6 items); rigor of development (10 items); recommendations (4 items); external review and quality assurance (2 items); funding, declaration, and management of interest (2 items); and other information (3 items). A user guide with explanations and real-world examples for each item was developed to provide a better user experience. Limitation: The RIGHT-Ad@pt checklist requires further vali-dation in real-life use. Conclusion: The RIGHT-Ad@pt checklist has been developed to improve the reporting of adapted guidelines, focusing on the standardization, rigor, and transparency of the process and the clarity and explicitness of adapted recommendations. Primary Funding Source: None.
Filiaciones:
Song, Y:
Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Iberoamer Cochrane Ctr CCIb, Biomed Res Inst St Pau IIB St Pau, Barcelona, Spain
Univ Autonoma Barcelona, PhD Programme Methodol Biomed Res & Publ Hlth, Barcelona, Spain
Alonso-Coello, P:
Biomed Res Inst St Pau IIB St Pau, Iberoamer Cochrane Ctr CCIb, Barcelona, Spain
Ctr Invest Biom ed Red Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIB, Barcelona, Spain
Ballesteros, M:
Ctr Invest Biom ed Red Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIB, Barcelona, Spain
Vernooij, RWM:
Univ Utrecht, Dept Hypertens & Nephrol, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Univ Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Arayssi, T:
Weill Cornell Med Qatar, Doha, Qatar
Bhaumik, S:
George Inst Global Hlth, Meta Res & Evidence Synth Unit, New Delhi, India
Chen, YL:
Lanzhou Univ, Res Unit Evidence Based Evaluat & Guidelines, Chinese Acad Med Sci 2021RU017, Sch Basic Med Sci, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
WHO Collaborating Ctr Guideline Implementat & Kno, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
Ghersi, D:
Natl Hlth & Med Res Council, Canberra, ACT, Australia
Langlois, EV:
WHO, Partnership Maternal Newborn & Child Hlth PMNCH, Geneva, Switzerland
Padilla, PF:
Univ Antofagasta, Fac Med & Odontol, Antofagasta, Chile
Schunemann, HJ:
McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact HEI, Michael G DeGroote Cochrane Canada Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
McMaster Univ, McGRADE Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Milan, Italy
Akl, EA:
Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Internal Med, Beirut, Lebanon
McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact HEI, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Garcia, LM:
Biomed Res Inst St Pau IIB St Pau, Iberoamer Cochrane Ctr CCIb, Barcelona, Spain
Ctr Invest Biom ed Red Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIB, Barcelona, Spain
|