Clinical and ultrasound features of benign, borderline, and malignant invasive mucinous ovarian tumors


Por: Pascual, A, Guerriero, S, Rams, N, Juez, L, Ajossa, S, Graupera, B, Hereter, L, Cappai, A, Pero, M, Perniciano, M, Errasti, T, Parra, J, Solis, M, Alcazar, JL

Publicada: 1 ene 2017
Resumen:
Objective: To compare clinical and sonographic features of benign, borderline, and malignant invasive mucinous ovarian tumors (MOTs). Materials and Methods: Retrospective observational multicenter study comprising 365 women (mean age: 46.1 years) with a histologically confirmed benign, borderline or malignant invasive MOT. Clinical data (patient's age, patient's complaints), tumor markers (CA-125 and CA-19.9), and sonographic data (tumor size, bilaterality, morphology unilocular, multilocular, unilocular-solid, multilocular-solid and solid-, and IOTA color score) were reviewed and compared among these three groups. Women with ultrasound evidence on intra-abdominal disease spread were excluded. Results: Three hundred seventy-eight MOTs (14 women had bilateral lesions) were analyzed. Histologically, 287 tumors were benign, 51 were borderline, and 40 were malignant. No difference in patient's mean age was observed. Women with borderline or invasive tumors were less frequently asymptomatic. Tumors were larger in case of invasive lesions. Borderline and invasive tumors showed solid components and exhibited IOTA color score 3 or 4, more frequently than benign lesions (p < 0.001). However, the authors discovered that 16 out of 51 (31.4%) of borderline tumors and six out of 40 (15.0%) of invasive cancers had no solid components and a color score 1 or 2, and were considered as a benign lesion by the sonologist. On the other hand, 96 out of 287 (33.4%) benign mucinous cystadenoma exhibited solid components and/or a color score of 3 or 4. Conclusions: In spite of statistical differences, the authors observed significant overlapping in ultrasound features among benign, borderline, and invasive ovarian mucinous tumors that renders a difficult accurate preoperative discrimination among these lesions.

Filiaciones:
Pascual, A:
 Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Hosp Quiron Dexeus, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod, Barcelona, Spain

Guerriero, S:
 Univ Cagliari, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Policlin Univ Duilio Casula, Cagliari, Italy

Rams, N:
 Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Santa Creu & St Pau Hosp, Barcelona, Spain

Juez, L:
 Univ Navarra, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Clin Univ Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

Ajossa, S:
 Univ Cagliari, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Policlin Univ Duilio Casula, Cagliari, Italy

Graupera, B:
 Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Hosp Quiron Dexeus, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod, Barcelona, Spain

Cappai, A:
 Univ Cagliari, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Policlin Univ Duilio Casula, Cagliari, Italy

Pero, M:
 Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Santa Creu & St Pau Hosp, Barcelona, Spain

Perniciano, M:
 Univ Cagliari, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Policlin Univ Duilio Casula, Cagliari, Italy

Errasti, T:
 Univ Navarra, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Clin Univ Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

Parra, J:
 Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Santa Creu & St Pau Hosp, Barcelona, Spain

Solis, M:
 Univ Navarra, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Clin Univ Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

Alcazar, JL:
 Univ Navarra, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Clin Univ Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
ISSN: 03922936





EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY
Editorial
7847050 CANADA INC, 4900 COTE ST-LUC, APT#212, MONTREAL, QUEBEC H3W 2H3, CANADA, Canada
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 38 Número: 3
Páginas: 382-386
WOS Id: 000401497500011
ID de PubMed: 29693878

MÉTRICAS