Definite and indeterminate nonalcoholic steatohepatitis share similar clinical features and prognosis: A longitudinal study of 1893 biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease subjects


Por: Ampuero, J, Aller, R, Gallego-Duran, R, Crespo, J, Abad, J, Gonzalez-Rodriguez, A, Gomez-Camarero, J, Caballeria, J, Lo Iacono, O, Ibanez, L, Garcia-Samaniego, J, Martin-Mateos, R, Frances, R, Fernandez-Rodriguez, C, Diago, M, Soriano, G, Andrade, RJ, Latorre, R, Jorquera, F, Morillas, RM, Escudero, D, Estevez, P, Hernandez-Guerra, M, Augustin, S, Pareja-Megia, MJ, Banales, JM, Aspichueta, P, Benlloch, S, Rosales, JM, Salmeron, J, Turnes, J, Romero-Gomez, M

Publicada: 1 sep 2021 Ahead of Print: 1 may 2021
Resumen:
Background and Aim Histological score systems may not fully capture the essential nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) features, which is one of the leading causes of screening failure in clinical trials. We assessed the NASH distribution and its components across the fibrosis stages and their impact on the prognosis and their relationship with the concept of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). Methods Spanish multicenter study including 1893 biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients from HEPAmet registry. NASH was diagnosed by NAS score >= 4 (including steatosis, ballooning and lobular inflammation) and fibrosis by Kleiner score. The presence of MAFLD was determined. Progression to cirrhosis, first episode of decompensated cirrhosis and death were collected during the follow-up (4.7 +/- 3.8 years). Results Fibrosis was F0 34.3% (649/1893), F1 27% (511/1893), F2 16.5% (312/1893), F3 15% (284/1893) and F4 7.2% (137/1893). NASH diagnosis 51.9% (982/1893), and its individual components (severe steatosis, ballooning and lobular inflammation), increased from F0 (33.6%) to F2 (68.6%), and decreased significantly in F4 patients (51.8%) (P = .0001). More than 70% of non-NASH patients showed some inflammatory activity (ballooning or lobular inflammation), showing a similar MAFLD rate than NASH (96.2% [945/982] vs. 95.2% [535/562]) and significantly higher than nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) subjects (89.1% [311/349]) (P < .0001). Progression to cirrhosis was similar between NASH (9.5% [51/539]) and indeterminate NASH (7.9% [25/316]), and higher than steatosis (5% [14/263]) (logRank 8.417; P = .015). Death and decompensated cirrhosis were similar between these. Conclusions The prevalence of steatohepatitis decreased in advanced liver disease. However, most of these patients showed some inflammatory activity histologically and had metabolic disturbances. These findings should be considered in clinical trials whose main aim is to prevent cirrhosis progression and complications, liver transplant and death.

Filiaciones:
Ampuero, J:
 Univ Seville, Hosp Univ Virgen Rocio, Seville, Spain

 Inst Biomed Sevilla, SeLiver Grp, Seville, Spain

 CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain

Aller, R:
 Univ Valladolid, Hosp Clin Univ Valladolid, Ctr Invest Endocrinol & Nutr, Valladolid, Spain

Gallego-Duran, R:
 Inst Biomed Sevilla, SeLiver Grp, Seville, Spain

 CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain

Crespo, J:
 Hosp Univ Marques Valdecilla, Digest Dept, Santander, Spain

Abad, J:
 Hosp Univ Puerta Hierro, Digest Dept, Madrid, Spain

Gonzalez-Rodriguez, A:
 Hosp Univ Santa Cristina, Liver Res Unit, Inst Invest Sanitaria Princesa, Madrid, Spain

Gomez-Camarero, J:
 Hosp Univ Burgos, Digest Dept, Burgos, Spain

Caballeria, J:
 CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain

 Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer IDIBPAS, Hosp Clin, Liver Unit, Barcelona, Spain

Lo Iacono, O:
 Hosp Univ Tajo, Digest Dept, Aranjuez, Spain

Ibanez, L:
 CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain

 Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maranon, Inst Invest Sanitaria Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain

Garcia-Samaniego, J:
 CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain

 Hosp Univ La Paz, IDIPAZ, Madrid, Spain

Martin-Mateos, R:
 CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain

 Hosp Univ Ramon y Cajal, Digest Dept, Madrid, Spain

Frances, R:
 CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain

 Univ Miguel Hernandez, Hosp Gen Univ Alicante, Elche, Spain

Fernandez-Rodriguez, C:
 Univ Rey Juan Carlos, Hosp Univ Fdn Alcorcon, Mostoles, Spain

Diago, M:
 Hosp Gen Univ Valencia, Digest Dept, Valencia, Spain

Soriano, G:
 CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain

 Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Digest Dept, Barcelona, Spain

Andrade, RJ:
 CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain

 Univ Malaga, Inst Invest Biomed Malaga IBIMA, Hosp Univ Virgen Victoria, Unidad Gest Clin Enfermedades Digest, Malaga, Spain

Latorre, R:
 Hosp Univ Son Llatzer, Digest Dept, Mallorca, Spain

Jorquera, F:
 CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain

 Complejo Asistencial Univ Leon, Serv Aparato Digest, IBIOMED, Leon, Spain

Morillas, RM:
 CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain

 Hosp Badalona Germans Trias & Pujol, Digest Dept, Badalona, Spain

Escudero, D:
 Univ Valencia, Hosp Clin Univ Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Estevez, P:
 Complejo Hosp Univ Vigo, Digest Dept, Vigo, Spain

Hernandez-Guerra, M:
 Hosp Univ Canarias, Digest Dept, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain

Augustin, S:
 Hosp Valle De Hebron, Digest Dept, Barcelona, Spain

Pareja-Megia, MJ:
 Hosp Univ Virgen Valme, Pathol Dept, Seville, Spain

Banales, JM:
 CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain

 Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Dept Liver & Gastrointestinal Dis, Biodonostia Res Inst, Ikerbasque,Donostia Univ Hosp, San Sebastian, Spain

Aspichueta, P:
 CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain

 Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Biocruces Res Inst, Fac Med & Nursing, Dept Physiol, Leioa, Spain

Benlloch, S:
 CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain

 Hosp Univ & Politecn La Fe, Digest Dept, Valencia, Spain

Rosales, JM:
 Agencia Sanitaria Costa Sol, Digest Dept, Marbella, Spain

Salmeron, J:
 Hosp Univ San Cecilio, Digest Dept, Granada, Spain

Turnes, J:
 Complejo Hosp Pontevedra, Digest Dept, Pontevedra, Spain

Romero-Gomez, M:
 Univ Seville, Hosp Univ Virgen Rocio, Seville, Spain

 Inst Biomed Sevilla, SeLiver Grp, Seville, Spain

 CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain
ISSN: 14783223
Editorial
WILEY, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA, Dinamarca
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 41 Número: 9
Páginas: 2076-2086
WOS Id: 000648100600001
ID de PubMed: 33896100
imagen hybrid

MÉTRICAS