Non-invasive clinical and microscopic evaluation of the response to treatment with clobetasol cream vs. calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate foam in mild to moderate plaque psoriasis: an investigator-initiated, phase IV, unicentric, open, randomized clinical trial


Por: Yelamos, O, Alejo, B, Ertekin, SS, Villa-Crespo, L, Zamora-Barquero, S, Martinez, N, Dominguez, M, Iglesias, P, Herrero, A, Malvehy, J, Puig, S

Publicada: 1 ene 2021 Ahead of Print: 1 jul 2020
Resumen:
Background: Treatment response for psoriasis is typically evaluated using clinical scores. However, patients can relapse after clinical clearance, suggesting persistent inflammation. Dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) can non-invasively improve treatment response assessment. Objectives: To compare the clinical and non-invasive microscopic features in a psoriatic target lesion treated with clobetasol cream or calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate foam (Cal/BD foam). Methods: Prospective, unicentric, open, randomized clinical trial comparing clinical data [total clinical score (TCS)] and microscopic data (dermoscopy, RCM and OCT) in psoriasis patients treated with clobetasol or Cal/BD foam. Results: We included 36 adult patients (22 men). At week 4, more patients treated with Cal/BD foam achieved TCS <= 1 than with clobetasol (63.2% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.016). Treatment satisfaction was higher with Cal/BD foam (P < 0.03). Microscopically, Cal/BD foam induced more reduction in epidermal thickness at week 4 (P < 0.049). Dilated horizontal blood vessels were more common with clobetasol than with Cal/BD foam at week 8 (69.2% vs. 31.2%, P = 0.159). If epidermal hyperplasia was noted at baseline, the response was poorer with clobetasol (P = 0.029). Limitations: Small sample size, open study, imaging sampling bias. Conclusion: Cal/BD foam is more effective than clobetasol, has better patient satisfaction and induces greater reduction in the hyperkeratosis/acanthosis, regardless of baseline epidermal hyperplasia.

Filiaciones:
Yelamos, O:
 Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer, Dermatol Dept, Barcelona, Spain

 Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Dermatol, Hosp Santa Creu & St Pau, Barcelona, Spain

 Ctr Med Teknon Quironsalud, Dept Dermatol, Barcelona, Spain

Alejo, B:
 Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer, Dermatol Dept, Barcelona, Spain

Ertekin, SS:
 Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer, Dermatol Dept, Barcelona, Spain

Villa-Crespo, L:
 Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer, Dermatol Dept, Barcelona, Spain

Zamora-Barquero, S:
 Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer, Dermatol Dept, Barcelona, Spain

Martinez, N:
 Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer, Dermatol Dept, Barcelona, Spain

Dominguez, M:
 Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer, Dermatol Dept, Barcelona, Spain

Iglesias, P:
 Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer, Dermatol Dept, Barcelona, Spain

Herrero, A:
 Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer, Dermatol Dept, Barcelona, Spain

Malvehy, J:
 Inst Salud Carlos III, CIBER Enfermedades Raras, Madrid, Spain

Puig, S:
 Inst Salud Carlos III, CIBER Enfermedades Raras, Madrid, Spain
ISSN: 09269959
Editorial
WILEY, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA, Reino Unido
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 35 Número: 1
Páginas: 143-149
WOS Id: 000545442600001
ID de PubMed: 32365242
imagen Green Published, hybrid

MÉTRICAS