The Impact of II-look Ureteroscopy on Survival in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study of EAU-YAU Urothelial Working Group


Por: Gallioli, A, Di Bello, F, Laukhtina, E, D'Andrea, D, Beltrami, P, Celso, FG, Krajewski, W, Afferi, L, Soria, F, Marcq, G, Del Giudice, F, De Lorenzis, E, Moschini, M, Mari, A, Subiela, JD, Baboudjian, M, Avesani, G, Territo, A, Basile, G, Dieguez, L, Izquierdo, P, Palou, J, Pradere, B, Breda, A

Publicada: 1 jun 2026 Ahead of Print: 1 abr 2026
Resumen:
Background and objective: No previous study quantified the survival outcomes of second-look ureteroscopy (SU). We hypothesized that patients who underwent SU might exhibit better survival outcomes than their no-SU counterparts. Methods: We relied on a multicenter retrospective database including 358 patients with UTUC treated conservatively between 2010 and 2021. Endpoints, namely overall survival (OS) and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) rates, modeled as competing event for other-cause mortality (OCM), were quantified. Cancer-specific mortality (CSM), and OCM were also quantified according to SU. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methodology was used to assess OS. Landmark analysis for OS at 2 mo was also performed. Key findings: Based on a median follow-up of 32 mo (interquartile range 16-56), 291 patients with UTUC were identified. Of those, 148 (51%) underwent SU. Median OS in patients who underwent SU was 103 versus 66 mo in patients without SU (D = 37 mo; p = 0.0024). RNU rates did not differ among the groups (24 vs 21%, p = 0.8). In IPTW-adjusted multivariable Cox regression models, adjusted number of lesions, tumor size, age, UTUC site, Charlson Comorbidity Index, high-grade, cytology, and ureteroscopy indication, SU patients were associated with higher OS rates compared to those without SU (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.94; p = 0.02). Within tumor <= 10 mm, four (3%) UTUC recurred in the first 9 mo of follow-up. Conclusions and clinical implications: Within the current study, SU ensured an optimal clinical decision-making. Specifically, CSM and OCM rates of SU patients and their counterparts not receiving SU validated the patients with UTUC selection for conservative treatment. (c) 2026 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creative-commons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Filiaciones:
Gallioli, A:
 Fundacio Puigvert, Urol, Barcelona, Spain

 Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Dept Surg, Barcelona, Spain

 Inst Recerca St Pau IR St Pau, Barcelona, Spain

Di Bello, F:
 Fundacio Puigvert, Urol, Barcelona, Spain

 Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Neurosci Sci Reprod & Odontostomatol, Via Pansini, I-80131 Naples, Italy

Laukhtina, E:
 Med Univ Vienna, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria

D'Andrea, D:
 Med Univ Vienna, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria

Beltrami, P:
 Univ Padua, Dept Surg Oncol & Gastroenterol, Urol Clin, Padua, Italy

Celso, FG:
 Univ Padua, Dept Surg Oncol & Gastroenterol, Urol Clin, Padua, Italy

Krajewski, W:
 Wroclaw Med Univ, Minimally Invas & Robot Urol, Wroclaw, Poland

Afferi, L:
 Luzerner Kantonsspital, Urol, Luzern, Switzerland

 Kantonsspital Aarau, Dept Urol, Aarau, Switzerland

Soria, F:
 Univ Turin, Turin, Italy

 Citta Salute & Sci, Surg Sci, Turin, Italy

Marcq, G:
 Claude Huriez Hosp, Urol, Lille, France

Del Giudice, F:
 Sapienza Univ Rome, Policlin Umberto I Hosp, Dept Maternal Infant & Urol Sci, Rome, Italy

De Lorenzis, E:
 Univ Milan, Dept Clin Sci & Community Hlth, Milan, Italy

 Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Dept Urol, Milan, Italy

Moschini, M:
 IRCCS San Raffaele Hosp, Urol, Milan, Italy

Mari, A:
 Univ Florence, Florence, Italy

 Careggi Hosp, Urol Robot Surg & Renal Transplantat, Florence, Italy

Subiela, JD:
 Univ Alcala, Hosp Univ Ramon y Cajal IRYCIS, Urol, Madrid, Spain

Baboudjian, M:
 North Acad Hosp, AP HM, Dept Urol, Marseille, France

Avesani, G:
 Fundacio Puigvert, Urol, Barcelona, Spain

 IRCCS San Raffaele Hosp, Urol, Milan, Italy

Territo, A:
 Fundacio Puigvert, Urol, Barcelona, Spain

Basile, G:
 Fundacio Puigvert, Urol, Barcelona, Spain

Dieguez, L:
 Fundacio Puigvert, Urol, Barcelona, Spain

Izquierdo, P:
 Fundacio Puigvert, Urol, Barcelona, Spain

Palou, J:
 Fundacio Puigvert, Urol, Barcelona, Spain

Pradere, B:
 Urosud Croix Sud Hosp, Urol, Quint Fonsegrives, France

Breda, A:
 Fundacio Puigvert, Urol, Barcelona, Spain
ISSN: 26661691





European Urology Open Science
Editorial
ELSEVIER, RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, Países Bajos
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 88 Número:
Páginas: 31-38
WOS Id: 001759414700001
ID de PubMed: 42088079
imagen Green Submitted, gold

MÉTRICAS