Robot-assisted vs open kidney transplantation from deceased donors


Por: Afferi, L, Territo, A, Pecoraro, A, Masieri, L, Ortved, M, Dagnaes-Hansen, JA, Etcheverry, B, Gallioli, A, Cannoletta, D, Vangeneugden, J, Mercier, J, Prudhomme, T, Donnini, I, Vazzana, A, Rohrsted, M, Vigues, F, Doumerc, N, Decaestecker, K, Palou, J, Campi, R, Serni, S, Roder, A, Breda, A

Publicada: 1 sep 2025 Ahead of Print: 1 may 2025
Resumen:
Objectives To test the hypothesis that the type of surgical approach, robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) vs open kidney transplantation (OKT), impacts intra-operative and postoperative surgical outcomes of patients receiving kidney transplantation from deceased donors. Materials and Methods This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study including 676 patients who received RAKT or OKT in the period 2015 to 2023 in one of seven European academic centres. Patient heterogeneity at baseline was balanced using 2:1 nearest neighbour propensity-score matching. Intra- and postoperative complications were reported according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Kaplan-Meier estimates and the log-rank test were used to compare dialysis-free survival (DFS), graft survival (GS), reintervention-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) according to the surgical approach used. Results After propensity-score matching, two cohorts of 72 recipients (65%) in the OKT group and 37 (35%) in the RAKT group with similar baseline characteristics were obtained. The site of transplantation was the right iliac fossa in 59 (82%) and 28 patients (76%) undergoing OKT and RAKT, respectively. RAKT was associated with shorter rewarming time (53 vs 39 min), total vascular anastomosis time (55 vs 36 min), and arterial (25 vs 17 min) and venous (28 vs 18 min) anastomosis times (all P < 0.001), whereas OKT was associated with reduced surgical time (180 vs 200 min; P = 0.01). Intra-operative complications were more commonly reported in recipients undergoing OKT (8.3% vs 2.7%; P = 0.4). During follow-up, no differences in terms of postoperative complications, DFS, GS, RFS or OS were detected. Conclusions This is the largest comparative study of RAKT vs OKT in the deceased donor setting. While it confirms the safety of RAKT from deceased donors, it underscores the superiority of RAKT in selected patients in terms of achieving vascular anastomosis and rewarming time in a shorter timeframe.

Filiaciones:
Afferi, L:
 Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Dept Surg, Barcelona, Spain

 Fundacio Puigvert, Dept Urol, Barcelona, Spain

 Luzerner Kantonsspital, Dept Urol, Luzern, Switzerland

Territo, A:
 Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Dept Surg, Barcelona, Spain

Pecoraro, A:
 Univ Florence, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Unit Oncol, Florence, Italy

 Univ Florence, Careggi Hosp, Unit Urol Robot Surg & Renal Transplantat, Florence, Italy

Masieri, L:
 Univ Florence, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Unit Oncol, Florence, Italy

 Univ Florence, Careggi Hosp, Unit Urol Robot Surg & Renal Transplantat, Florence, Italy

Ortved, M:
 Rigshosp, Urol Res Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark

Dagnaes-Hansen, JA:
 Rigshosp, Urol Res Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark

Etcheverry, B:
 Hosp Bellvitge Princeps Espanya, Dept Urol, Barcelona, Spain

Gallioli, A:
 Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Dept Surg, Barcelona, Spain

Cannoletta, D:
 Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Dept Surg, Barcelona, Spain

 IRCCS San Raffaele Sci Inst, Urol Res Inst, Div Oncol, Soldera Prostate Canc Lab,Unit Urol, Milan, Italy

Vangeneugden, J:
 Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Ghent, Belgium

 AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium

 Univ Ghent, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Human Struct & Repair, Ghent, Belgium

Mercier, J:
 Hosp Toulouse, Dept Urol, Toulouse, France

Prudhomme, T:
 Hosp Toulouse, Dept Urol, Toulouse, France

Donnini, I:
 Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Dept Surg, Barcelona, Spain

Vazzana, A:
 Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Dept Surg, Barcelona, Spain

Rohrsted, M:
 Rigshosp, Urol Res Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark

Vigues, F:
 Hosp Bellvitge Princeps Espanya, Dept Urol, Barcelona, Spain

Doumerc, N:
 Hosp Toulouse, Dept Urol, Toulouse, France

Decaestecker, K:
 Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Ghent, Belgium

 AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium

 Univ Ghent, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Human Struct & Repair, Ghent, Belgium

Palou, J:
 Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Dept Surg, Barcelona, Spain

 Fundacio Puigvert, Dept Urol, Barcelona, Spain

Campi, R:
 Univ Florence, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Unit Oncol, Florence, Italy

 Univ Florence, Careggi Hosp, Unit Urol Robot Surg & Renal Transplantat, Florence, Italy

Serni, S:
 Univ Florence, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Unit Oncol, Florence, Italy

 Univ Florence, Careggi Hosp, Unit Urol Robot Surg & Renal Transplantat, Florence, Italy

Roder, A:
 Rigshosp, Urol Res Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark

Breda, A:
 Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Dept Surg, Barcelona, Spain

 Fundacio Puigvert, Dept Urol, Barcelona, Spain
ISSN: 14644096





BJU INTERNATIONAL
Editorial
WILEY, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA, Reino Unido
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 136 Número: 3
Páginas: 484-492
WOS Id: 001494981000001
ID de PubMed: 40415630
imagen Green Submitted, hybrid

MÉTRICAS