The efficacy of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: results from 2946 patients


Por: Giulioni, C, Castellani, D, Somani, BK, Chew, B, Tailly, T, Keat, WOL, Teoh, JY, Emiliani, E, Chai, CA, Galosi, AB, Ragoori, D, Tanidir, Y, Hamri, SB, Gadzhiev, N, Traxer, O, Gauhar, V

Publicada: 17 mar 2023 Ahead of Print: 1 mar 2023
Resumen:
PurposeTo evaluate the perioperative outcomes of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones (LPS) and factors affecting stone-free rate (SFR).MethodsData from 20 centers were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were adult patients, normal renal anatomy, and LPS. Exclusion criteria were bilateral surgery, concomitant surgery for ureteral stones. SFR was defined as a single residual fragment (RF) <= 2 mm and evaluated 3-months after surgery. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with RF. Statistical significance was set at p value < 0.05.Results2946 patients were included. Mean age and stone size were 49.9 years 10.19 mm, with multiple LPS in 61.1% of cases. Total operation and laser time were 63.89 +/- 37.65 and 17.34 +/- 18.39 min, respectively. Mean hospital stay was 3.55 days. Hematuria requiring blood transfusion and fever/urinary infections requiring prolonged antibiotics occurred in 6.1% and 169 5.7% of cases, while sepsis with intensive-care admission in 1.1% of patients. On multivariate analysis, Multiple stones (OR 1.380), stone size (OR 1.865), and reusable ureteroscopes (OR 1.414) were significantly associated with RF, while Thulium fiber laser (TFL) (OR 0.341) and pre-stenting (OR 0.750) were less likely associated with RF.ConclusionsRIRS showed safety and efficacy for LPS with a mean diameter of 10 mm. This procedure can achieve a satisfactory SFR in pre-stented patients with a single and smaller stone, particularly with TFL use.

Filiaciones:
Giulioni, C:
 Polytech Univ Marche, Urol Unit, Azienda Osped Univ Marche, Ancona, Italy

 Polytech Univ Marche, Dept Urol, 71 Conca St, I-60126 Ancona, Italy

Castellani, D:
 Polytech Univ Marche, Urol Unit, Azienda Osped Univ Marche, Ancona, Italy

Somani, BK:
 NHS Trust, Univ Hosp Southampton, Dept Urol, Southampton, England

Chew, B:
 Univ British Columbia, Dept Urol, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Tailly, T:
 Univ Hosp Ghent, Dept Urol, Ghent, Belgium

Keat, WOL:
 Penang Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, George Town, Malaysia

Teoh, JY:
 Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, SH Ho Urol Ctr, Dept Surg, Hong Kong, Peoples R China

Emiliani, E:
 Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Fdn Puigvert, Urol Dept, Barcelona, Spain

Chai, CA:
 Univ Malaya, Dept Surg, Urol Unit, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Galosi, AB:
 Polytech Univ Marche, Urol Unit, Azienda Osped Univ Marche, Ancona, Italy

Ragoori, D:
 Asian Inst Nephrol & Urol, Dept Urol, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Tanidir, Y:
 Marmara Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkiye

Hamri, SB:
 King Saud Bin Abdulaziz Univ Hlth Sci, King Abdullah Int Med Res Ctr, Div Urol, Minist Natl Guard Hlth Affairs,Dept Surg, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Gadzhiev, N:
 St Petersburg State Med Univ, Endourol Dept, St Petersburg, Russia

Traxer, O:
 Sorbonne Univ, Tenon Hosp, AP HP, Dept Urol, Paris, France

Gauhar, V:
 Ng Teng Fong Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Singapore, Singapore
ISSN: 07244983
Editorial
SPRINGER, ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES, Estados Unidos America
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 41 Número: 5
Páginas: 1407-1413
WOS Id: 000952171000006
ID de PubMed: 36930255
imagen hybrid, All Open Access, Hybrid Gold

MÉTRICAS