Impact of Resection Technique on Perioperative Outcomes and Surgical Margins after Partial Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Masses: A Prospective Multicenter Study


Por: Minervini, A, Campi, R, Lane, BR, De Cobelli, O, Sanguedolce, F, Hatzichristodoulou, G, Antonelli, A, Noyes, S, Mari, A, Rodriguez-Faba, O, Keeley, FX, Langenhuijsen, J, Musi, G, Klatte, T, Roscigno, M, Akdogan, B, Furlan, M, Karakoyunlu, N, Marszalek, M, Capitanio, U, Volpe, A, Brookman-May, S, Gschwend, JE, Smaldone, MC, Uzzo, RG, Carini, M, Kutikov, A

Publicada: 1 mar 2020
Resumen:
Purpose: The impact of resection technique on partial nephrectomy outcomes is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pattern of resection techniques during partial nephrectomy and the impact on perioperative outcomes, acute kidney injury, positive surgical margins and the achievement of the Trifecta (negative surgical margins, no perioperative Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or greater surgical complications and no postoperative acute kidney injury). Materials and Methods: We prospectively collected data on consecutive patients with cT1-2N0M0 renal masses treated with partial nephrectomy at a total of 16 referral centers from September 2014 to March 2015. After partial nephrectomy the resection technique was classified by the surgeon as enucleation, enucleoresection or resection according to the SIB (Surface-Intermediate-Base) margin scores 0 to 2, 3 or 4 and 5, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to evaluate the potential impact of the resection technique on postoperative surgical complications, positive surgical margins, acute kidney injury and Trifecta achievement. Results: Overall 507 patients were included in analysis. The resection technique was classified as enucleation in 266 patients (52%), enucleoresection in 150 (30%) and resection in 91 (18%). The resection technique (enucleoresection vs enucleation and resection) was the only significant predictor of positive surgical margins. Tumor complexity, surgical approach (open and laparoscopic vs robotic) and resection technique (enucleoresection vs enucleation) were significant predictors of Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or greater surgical complications. The surgical approach (open and laparoscopic vs robotic), the resection technique (enucleoresection vs enucleation) and warm ischemia time were significantly associated with postoperative acute kidney injury and Trifecta achievement. Conclusions: Resection techniques significantly impact surgical complications, early functional outcomes and positive surgical margins after partial nephrectomy of localized renal masses.

Filiaciones:
Minervini, A:
 Univ Florence, Dept Urol, Florence, Italy

Campi, R:
 Univ Florence, Dept Urol, Florence, Italy

Lane, BR:
 Spectrum Hlth Med Grp, Dept Urol, Grand Rapids, MI USA

De Cobelli, O:
 Univ Milan, Dept Urol, European Inst Oncol IEO, Milan, Italy

Sanguedolce, F:
 Southmead Hosp, Bristol Urol Inst, Bristol, Avon, England

 Fundacio Puigvert, Urooncol Unit, Barcelona, Spain

Hatzichristodoulou, G:
 Tech Univ Munich, Univ Hosp, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Urol, Munich, Germany

 Julius Maximilians Univ Wurzburg, Dept Urol & Pediat Urol, Wurzburg, Germany

Antonelli, A:
 Univ Brescia, Dept Urol, Brescia, Italy

Noyes, S:
 Spectrum Hlth Med Grp, Dept Urol, Grand Rapids, MI USA

Mari, A:
 Univ Florence, Dept Urol, Florence, Italy

Rodriguez-Faba, O:
 Fundacio Puigvert, Urooncol Unit, Barcelona, Spain

Keeley, FX:
 Southmead Hosp, Bristol Urol Inst, Bristol, Avon, England

Langenhuijsen, J:
 Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Musi, G:
 Univ Milan, Dept Urol, European Inst Oncol IEO, Milan, Italy

Klatte, T:
 Royal Bournemouth Hosp, Bournemouth, Dorset, England

 Med Univ Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Roscigno, M:
 ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy

Akdogan, B:
 Hacettepe Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Ankara, Turkey

Furlan, M:
 Univ Brescia, Dept Urol, Brescia, Italy

Karakoyunlu, N:
 Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Res Hosp, Ankara, Turkey

Marszalek, M:
 Graz Med Univ, Graz, Austria

 Donauspital, Dept Urol & Androl, Vienna, Austria

Capitanio, U:
 IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, URI, Div Expt Oncol, Unit Urol, Milan, Italy

Volpe, A:
 Univ Piemonte Orientale, Maggiore Carita Hosp, Novara, Italy

Brookman-May, S:
 Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany

 Janssen Pharma Res & Dev, Los Angeles, CA USA

Gschwend, JE:
 Tech Univ Munich, Univ Hosp, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Urol, Munich, Germany

Smaldone, MC:
 Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Div Urol Oncol, 7701 Burholme Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA

Uzzo, RG:
 Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Div Urol Oncol, 7701 Burholme Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA

Carini, M:
 Univ Florence, Dept Urol, Florence, Italy

Kutikov, A:
 Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Div Urol Oncol, 7701 Burholme Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
ISSN: 00225347





JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Editorial
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, TWO COMMERCE SQ, 2001 MARKET ST, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 USA, Estados Unidos America
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 203 Número: 3
Páginas: 496-503
WOS Id: 000520424700063
ID de PubMed: 31609167

MÉTRICAS