A multi-criteria decision analysis on the value of nintedanib for interstitial lung diseases


Por: Zozaya N., Arrizubieta Basterrechea M.I., Bollo E., Castellví I., Espín J., Ortego N., Poveda-Andrés J.L., Rodríguez Portal J.A., Rivero A., Marcos-Rodríguez J.A., Verde L.

Publicada: 1 ago 2022 Ahead of Print: 1 ago 2022
Resumen:
Objectives Our aim was to assess the value of nintedanib for non-idiopathic progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (non-IPF PF-ILD) and systemic sclerosis-associated ILD (SSc-ILD) in the Spanish context, using a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). Methods Following an adaptation of the Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcision Making (EVIDEM) MCDA methodology, the estimated value of nintedanib was obtained by means of an additive linear model that combined individual weights (100-points distribution) of criteria with the individual scoring of nintedanib in each criterion for every indication, assigned by a multidisciplinary committee of twelve clinicians, patients, pharmacists, and decision-makers. To assess the reproducibility, an alternative weighting method was applied, as well as a re-test of weights and scores at a different moment of time. Results The experts committee recognized nintedanib as an intervention with a positive value contribution in comparison to placebo for the treatment of non-IPF PF-ILD (0.50 ± 0.16, on a scale from -1 to 1) and SSc-ILD (0.40 ± 0.12), diseases which were considered as very severe and with high unmet needs. The drug was perceived as a treatment that provides an added therapeutic benefit for patients (0.06-0.07), given its proven clinical efficacy (0.05-0.06), slight improvements in patient-reported outcomes (0.01-0.02), and similar safety profile than placebo (-0.04-0.00), which will likely be positioned as a recommended therapy in the next clinical practice guidelines updates. Conclusions Under this increasingly used methodology, nintedanib has shown to provide a positive value estimate for non-IPF PF-ILD and SSc-ILD when compared to placebo in Spain. © Author(s).

Filiaciones:
Zozaya N.:
 Department of Health Economics, Weber, Madrid, Spain

 Department of Quantitative Methods in Economics and Management, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain

Arrizubieta Basterrechea M.I.:
 Department of Pneumology, Hospital Universitario de Galdakao-Usansolo, Bizkaia, Spain

Bollo E.:
 Department of Pneumology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain

Castellví I.:
 Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitari de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

Espín J.:
 Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain

Ortego N.:
 Unit of Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain

Poveda-Andrés J.L.:
 Department of Pharmacy, Unit of Clinical Medications, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain

Rodríguez Portal J.A.:
 Department of Pneumology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Del Rocío, Seville, Spain

 Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red - Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain

Rivero A.:
 Bioregión de Salud y Bienestar (BioMad), Madrid, Spain

Marcos-Rodríguez J.A.:
 Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain

Verde L.:
 Management Department, Integrated Health Area, A Coruña, Spain
ISSN: 02664623





INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
Editorial
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS, 32 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, NEW YORK, NY 10013-2473 USA, Reino Unido
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 38 Número: 1
Páginas:
WOS Id: 000834351200001
ID de PubMed: 35912833
imagen All Open Access; Hybrid Gold

MÉTRICAS