The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP-tool): a Delphi consensus project on standardised evaluation of flexible ureterorenoscopes


Por: Henderickx, MMEL, Hendriks, N, Baard, J, Wiseman, OJ, Scotland, KB, Somani, BK, Sener, TE, Emiliani, E, Dragos, LB, Villa, L, Talso, M, Bin Hamri, S, Proietti, S, Doizi, S, Traxer, O, Chew, BH, Eisner, BH, Monga, M, Hsi, RS, Stern, KL, Leavitt, DA, Rivera, M, Wollin, DA, Borofsky, M, Canvasser, NE, Ingimarsson, JP, El Tayeb, MM, Bhojani, N, Gadzhiev, N, Tailly, T, Durutovic, O, Nagele, U, Skolarikos, A, Schout, BMA, Beerlage, HP, Pelger, RCM, Kamphuis, GM

Publicada: 1 abr 2023 Ahead of Print: 1 oct 2022
Resumen:
Objective To develop a standardised tool to evaluate flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURS). Materials and Methods A three-stage consensus building approach based on the modified Delphi technique was performed under guidance of a steering group. First, scope- and user-related parameters used to evaluate fURS were identified through a systematic scoping review. Then, the main categories and subcategories were defined, and the expert panel was selected. Finally, a two-step modified Delphi consensus project was conducted to firstly obtain consensus on the relevance and exact definition of each (sub)category necessary to evaluate fURS, and secondly on the evaluation method (setting, used tools and unit of outcome) of those (sub)categories. Consensus was reached at a predefined threshold of 80% high agreement. Results The panel consisted of 30 experts in the field of endourology. The first step of the modified Delphi consensus project consisted of two questionnaires with a response rate of 97% (n = 29) for both. Consensus was reached for the relevance and definition of six main categories and 12 subcategories. The second step consisted of three questionnaires (response rate of 90%, 97% and 100%, respectively). Consensus was reached on the method of measurement for all (sub)categories. Conclusion This modified Delphi consensus project reached consensus on a standardised grading tool for the evaluation of fURS - The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP) tool. This is a first step in creating uniformity in this field of research to facilitate future comparison of outcomes of the functionality and handling of fURS.

Filiaciones:
Henderickx, MMEL:
 Amsterdam UMC Locat Univ Amsterdam, Dept Urol, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Hendriks, N:
 Amsterdam UMC Locat Univ Amsterdam, Dept Urol, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands

 Alrijne Hosp, Dept Urol, Leiden, Netherlands

Baard, J:
 Amsterdam UMC Locat Univ Amsterdam, Dept Urol, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Wiseman, OJ:
 Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Urol, Cambridge, England

Scotland, KB:
 Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA USA

Somani, BK:
 Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Trust, Dept Urol, Southampton, Hants, England

Sener, TE:
 Marmara Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey

Emiliani, E:
 Fundacio Puigvert, Dept Urol, Barcelona, Spain

Dragos, LB:
 Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Urol, Cambridge, England

Villa, L:
 Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Dept Urol, Milan, Italy

Talso, M:
 ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco Osped Luigi Sacco Uni, Dept Urol, Milan, Italy

Bin Hamri, S:
 King Saud Bin Abdulaziz Univ Hlth Sci, Coll Med, King Abdullah Int Med Res Ctr, Dept Urol, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Proietti, S:
 IRCCS San Raffaele Hosp, Dept Urol, Milan, Italy

Doizi, S:
 Hop Tenon, Dept Urol, Paris, France

 Sorbonne Univ, Grp Rech Clin Lithiase Urinaire, GRC 20, F-27063 Paris, France

Traxer, O:
 Hop Tenon, Dept Urol, Paris, France

 Sorbonne Univ, Grp Rech Clin Lithiase Urinaire, GRC 20, F-27063 Paris, France

Chew, BH:
 Univ British Columbia, Dept Urol, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Eisner, BH:
 Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Boston, MA USA

Monga, M:
 Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Urol, San Diego, CA USA

Hsi, RS:
 Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA

Stern, KL:
 Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Phoenix, AZ USA

Leavitt, DA:
 Henry Ford Hosp, Vattikuti Urol Inst, Dept Urol, Detroit, MI USA

Rivera, M:
 Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Urol, Indianapolis, IN USA

Wollin, DA:
 Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Urol, Boston, MA USA

Borofsky, M:
 Univ Minnesota, Dept Urol, Minneapolis, MN USA

Canvasser, NE:
 Univ Calif Davis Hlth Syst, Dept Urol, Sacramento, CA USA

Ingimarsson, JP:
 Maine Med Ctr, Dept Urol, South Portland, ME USA

El Tayeb, MM:
 Baylor Scott & White Med Ctr Temple, Dept Urol, Temple, TX USA

Bhojani, N:
 Univ Montreal, Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Dept Urol, Montreal, PQ, Canada

Gadzhiev, N:
 Endourol Acad, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey

Tailly, T:
 Univ Hosp Ghent, Dept Urol, Ghent, Belgium

Durutovic, O:
 Univ Clin Ctr Serbia, Dept Urol, Belgrade, Serbia

Nagele, U:
 Gen Hosp Hall IT, Dept Urol, Hall In Tirol, Austria

Skolarikos, A:
 Univ Athens, Dept Urol, Athens, Greece

Schout, BMA:
 Alrijne Hosp, Dept Urol, Leiden, Netherlands

Beerlage, HP:
 Amsterdam UMC Locat Univ Amsterdam, Dept Urol, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Pelger, RCM:
 Leiden Univ, Dept Urol, Leids UMC, Leiden, Netherlands

Kamphuis, GM:
 Amsterdam UMC Locat Univ Amsterdam, Dept Urol, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
ISSN: 14644096
Editorial
WILEY, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA, Reino Unido
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 131 Número: 4
Páginas: 494-502
WOS Id: 000873478900001
ID de PubMed: 36208033
imagen Green Published, hybrid, All Open Access; Hybrid Gold

MÉTRICAS