Efficacy of caspofungin and itraconazole as secondary antifungal prophylaxis: analysis of data from a multinational case registry


Por: Vehreschild, JJ, Sieniawski, M, Reuter, S, Arenz, D, Reichert, D, Maertens, J, Bohme, A, Silling, G, Martino, R, Maschmeyer, G, Rueping, MJGT, Ullmann, AJ, Cornely, OA

Publicada: 1 nov 2009
Resumen:
Patients surviving invasive fungal disease (IFD) and needing further antineoplastic chemotherapy are at high risk of recurrent fungal infection. In the absence of randomised controlled trials in this area, secondary prophylactic regimens are diverse. From 448 patients registered with the Multinational Case Registry of Secondary Antifungal Prophylaxis, we performed an analysis of patients receiving caspofungin (CAS) or itraconazole (ITC). All patients had an underlying haematological malignancy and had been diagnosed with an episode of IFD earlier in their course of treatment. Data collected comprised demographics, underlying disease, first episode of IFD, antifungal prophylaxis, incidence and outcome of breakthrough IFD and survival. A total of 75 patients were evaluated, comprising 28 receiving CAS and 47 receiving ITC. Patients in the CAS group were more likely to have had progression of underlying disease (32.1% vs. 8.5%; P = 0.028) as well as incomplete response of initial IFD at baseline (85.7% vs. 57.4%; P = 0.005). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation was more prevalent in patients receiving CAS (46.4% vs. 14.9%; P = 0.010). There was no difference in the occurrence of breakthrough IFD between both groups (32.1% vs. 31.9%). Treatment outcomes for recurrent IFD and overall mortality did not differ between groups. Both ITC and CAS were equally effective in preventing second episodes of IFD. Patients with uncontrolled first IFD, uncontrolled underlying disease or those receiving stem cell transplantation were more likely to have received CAS prophylaxis. Despite antifungal prophylaxis, risk of breakthrough IFD was high in both groups. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Filiaciones:
Vehreschild, JJ:
 Klinikum Univ Koln, Innere Med Klin 1, D-50937 Cologne, Germany

Sieniawski, M:
 Klinikum Univ Koln, Innere Med Klin 1, D-50937 Cologne, Germany

Reuter, S:
 Univ Klinikum Dusseldorf, Klin Gastroenterol Hepatol & Infektiol, Dusseldorf, Germany

Arenz, D:
 Klinikum Univ Koln, Innere Med Klin 1, D-50937 Cologne, Germany

 Klinikum Univ Koln, ZKS Koln, BMBF 01KN0706, D-50937 Cologne, Germany

Reichert, D:
 Hamatol Onkol Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr Reichert Dr, Westerstede, Germany

Maertens, J:
 Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Hematol, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium

Bohme, A:
 Onkologikum Frankfurt Museumsufer, Frankfurt, Germany

Silling, G:
 Univ Klinikum Munster, Med Klin A, Munster, Germany

Martino, R:
 Hosp Santa Crue & Santa Pau Barcelona, Div Clin Hematol, Barcelona, Spain

Maschmeyer, G:
 Klinikum Ernst Von Bergmann, Klin Hamatol & Onkol, Potsdam, Germany

Rueping, MJGT:
 Klinikum Univ Koln, Innere Med Klin 1, D-50937 Cologne, Germany

Ullmann, AJ:
 Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Med 3, Mainz, Germany

Cornely, OA:
 Klinikum Univ Koln, Innere Med Klin 1, D-50937 Cologne, Germany

 Klinikum Univ Koln, ZKS Koln, BMBF 01KN0706, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
ISSN: 09248579
Editorial
ELSEVIER, RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, NL
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 34 Número: 5
Páginas: 446-450
WOS Id: 000270544200010
ID de PubMed: 19700265
imagen Open Access

MÉTRICAS