Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists


Por: Egevad, L, Ahmad, AS, Algaba, F, Berney, DM, Boccon-Gibod, L, Comperat, E, Evans, AJ, Griffiths, D, Grobholz, R, Kristiansen, G, Langner, C, Lopez-Beltran, A, Montironi, R, Moss, S, Oliveira, P, Vainer, B, Varma, M, Camparo, P

Publicada: 1 ene 2013
Resumen:
Egevad L, Ahmad A S, Algaba F, Berney D M, Boccon-Gibod L, Comperat E, Evans A J, Griffiths D, Grobholz R, Kristiansen G, Langner C, Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R, Moss S, Oliveira P, Vainer B, Varma M & Camparo P (2013) Histopathology 62, 247-256 Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists Aims: The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) modification of Gleason grading recommended that the highest grade should always be included in the Gleason score (GS) in prostate biopsies. We analysed the impact of this recommendation on reporting of GS 6 versus 7. Methods and results: Fifteen expert uropathologists reached two-thirds consensus on 15 prostate biopsies with GS 67 cancer. Eighty-five microphotographs were graded by 337 of 617 members of the European Network of Uropathology (ENUP), representing 19 countries. There was agreement between expert and majority member GS in 12 of 15 cases, while members upgraded in three cases. Among members and the expert consensus, a GS >6 was assigned by 64.5% and 60%, respectively. Mean member GS was higher than consensus GS in nine of 15 cases. A Gleason pattern (GP) 5 was reported by 0.35.6% in 10 cases. Agreement between consensus and member GS was 58.289.3% (mean 71.4%) in GS 6 cases and 46.363.8% (mean 56.4%) in GS 7 cases (P = 0.009). Conclusions: While undergrading of prostate cancer used to be prevalent, some now tend to overgrade. Minimum diagnostic criteria for GP 4 and 5 in biopsies need to be better defined. Image libraries reviewed by experts may be useful for standardization.

Filiaciones:
Egevad, L:
 Karolinska Inst, Karolinska Univ Hosp Solna, Dept Oncol Pathol, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden

Ahmad, AS:
 Queen Mary Univ London, Wolfson Inst Prevent Med, London, England

Algaba, F:
 Fundacio Puigvert Univ Autonomous, Barcelona, Spain

Berney, DM:
 St Bartholomews Hosp, London, England

Boccon-Gibod, L:
 Hop Armand Trousseau, Paris, France

Comperat, E:
 Hop La Pitie Salpetriere, Paris, France

Evans, AJ:
 Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Griffiths, D:
 Univ Wales Hosp, Cardiff CF4 4XW, S Glam, Wales

Grobholz, R:
 Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland

Kristiansen, G:
 Univ Hosp, Bonn, Germany

Langner, C:
 Med Univ, Graz, Austria

Lopez-Beltran, A:
 Univ Cordoba, Sch Med, Cordoba, Spain

Montironi, R:
 Polytech Univ Marche Reg, Ancona, Italy

Moss, S:
 Queen Mary Univ London, Wolfson Inst Prevent Med, London, England

Oliveira, P:
 Hosp da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal

Vainer, B:
 Rigshosp, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Varma, M:
 Univ Wales Hosp, Cardiff CF4 4XW, S Glam, Wales

Camparo, P:
 Hop Foch, Paris, France
ISSN: 03090167





HISTOPATHOLOGY
Editorial
WILEY, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA, Reino Unido
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 62 Número: 2
Páginas: 247-256
WOS Id: 000312534000005
ID de PubMed: 23240715

MÉTRICAS